Hello, All!
I haven't written in ages, and I apologize for that. I decided to do a Scrum Bubbles reboot and you can now view it at my very own site: www.scrumbubbles.com. Go check it out! I've transferred all content from this Blogger site to the new one.
Bon voyage, Blogger! You've been great, but it's time to move on.
Showing posts with label scrum. Show all posts
Showing posts with label scrum. Show all posts
Saturday, April 22, 2017
Monday, May 12, 2014
Traditional Project Management vs. Agile Project Management: Week 5
I love how everyone assumes that the project manager - ME - already knows everything. I can only wish I was omniscient.
These are just a few examples. I CANNOT wait for my daily stand-ups to begin with this team! I'll at least have SOME idea what everyone is working on.
- It is assumed that I know everyone who is responsible for certain test areas. When I don't and I ask who these people are, I am met with the "duh" look and a brief pause before they answer.
- It is assumed that I know exactly where to go to get past test scripts and documents, and it is assumed that I will search out said documents for the team... when THEY know where to get them to begin with.
- It is assumed that I know everyone's schedules and need to set up meetings according to my omniscience. No. I will not rearrange everyone else's schedule for one person, so please stop asking me to.
- It is assumed that I already know that the project is going to be late. My spidey senses tell me this, but as of now I have no empirical data to prove it.
These are just a few examples. I CANNOT wait for my daily stand-ups to begin with this team! I'll at least have SOME idea what everyone is working on.
Wednesday, May 7, 2014
Traditional Project Management vs. Agile Project Management: Week 4
So in my current role of PM, I'm experiencing the NEED to babysit EVERYONE on this project far more than I have in the past as a Scrum Master. Here are some examples:
- No one is sharing information even after I've requested it. I have to pull it from them. For instance, I had no idea that two of my "testers" were even available for my team. I find myself digging for documents after I've asked people to share them, too.
- Expectations are completely unclear. For instance, I just learned that I - as in ME - need to put together a test plan. For you traditional PMs out there this probably isn't new for you, but I've never done this before. Why? Because I had self-organizing, cross-functional teams that took it upon themselves to take care of this crucial tidbit. Now I get the unsavory task of asking everyone to document what they're doing so far.
- Communication seems incredibly stifled since we don't yet have daily stand-ups. For instance, dates (such as whether or not we'll have to work over the 4th of July weekend) have been up the air for at least two weeks. AND dare I mention the tester availability thing again?
What are some differences you've noticed and how did you manage them? I'm feeling like a fish out of water in this more waterfall type of environment (yes. pun intended.)
Friday, August 23, 2013
Favorite Agile Tweet of the Day
Check out @mike_bowler's Tweet: https://twitter.com/mike_bowler/status/371049721424388096
Tuesday, August 20, 2013
Backlog Grooming
I was going over some backlog grooming ideas with one of our Product Owners recently, so I thought I’d share these ideas with everyone.
When
preparing for sprint planning sessions, please take a moment to make sure the
top 20 stories in your project backlog are “shovel ready”. What do I mean
by this? Shovel Ready means that the stories have advanced to a state
that allows teammates to IMMEDIATELY start working on them. Ideally, this
should be done even before Release Planning, but that can’t always
happen.
Here’s how we get them shovel ready:
·
UAC in EVERY user story
o The
team needs to know what the Product Owner’s definition of done is. Your
definition of done is your user acceptance criteria. Don’t leave this to
sprint planning. We tend to go down rabbit holes as to what DONE actually
means. Product Owners, it is your job to set this standard, and it is the team’s job
to tell you whether or not your UAC is possible in the context of the
story. THAT’S what needs to be discussed during planning.
·
Possible story breakdown
o Evaluate
your user stories so succinctly that you can foresee whether or not they need
to be broken down into smaller stories. If you think you can group
certain data flows or business rule variations, then do that ahead of
time. If you are not sure how to break them down, check out Richard Lawrence's How To Split a User Story again . If you’re still at a loss, then by all means bring it to
the team.
·
Prioritize the backlog
o Have
the most important things you want worked on AT THE TOP of the backlog.
Make sure the team knows this priority, and make sure this priority is
reflected in the goals you set for the sprint.
·
Story Language
o Please
try to write stories in the format of “As a <blank> I want <blank>
so that I can <blank>”. This helps us keep the end user in
mind. I understand technical stories come up, but we need to try to stick
to this idea as much as possible.
o Be
very specific in the language of the story. Make it reflect the end goal.
If you have any other ideas you’d like to share, let’s share
them! Let me know if you have questions, as well. Each of you have
your own awesome style of handling user stories, so I encourage you to learn from
one another as well.
Labels:
agile,
agile best practices,
backlog,
backlog grooming,
ideas,
INVEST,
Product Owner,
Richard Lawrence,
scrum,
scrum best practices,
scrum blog,
scrum master,
software development,
user stories
Wednesday, August 14, 2013
How many types of Agile Retrospectives are there, anyway?
The other
day I noticed that we were getting pretty stagnant with our sprint
retrospectives. I have been asking these
questions: “What went well? What went less well? What areas improved from last
sprint? What areas need improvement?”
Sometimes we get some good discussions going, but most of the time I
have to prod my teammates for answers and feedback. This prompted me to go in search of something
new and better.
I have 4
teams, so it is important for me to come up with good ideas that can be used across
the board. My teams are also spread
across the United States and Canada, so activities in which ALL of us can
participate is definitely limited. Pickings were slim.
I found a
nice wiki
that listed out many different types of retrospectives. I pulled the below table from there. I had NO IDEA there were so many, and there were quite a few listed that I'd never heard of before. You can go to the link
to delve further into each type of retrospective if you like. This was a good start for me to get some
ideas.
Name
|
Summary
|
Use
|
Approx.
Duration (mins)
|
Uses De Bono's 6 Thinking Hats
to investigate process improvement
|
General use, but also a good
alternative to shuffling card type retrospectives
|
60
|
|
A retrospective in which teams
rated their abilities in each of the categories, displayed the different
ratings on a spider graph, and then discussed the result.
|
To talk about what abilities
are important to an Agile team and how your team rates against them
|
60
|
|
Uses Appreciative Inquiry to
identify what went so well. There is no blame or negativity, and builds on
the Prime Directive, that everyone in the team did the best job they could
possibly do.
|
To remind everyone what a good
job their doing rather than focusing on negatives every time you run a
retrospective.
|
60
|
|
Participants choose top 5
issues and bring them along for group to discuss and resolve
|
Expose the most pressing issues
in an initially anonymous manner and determine the most effective actions to
resolve them
|
45
|
|
A Retrospective Technique for
short term actions from long term goals
|
Really good for forcing
achievable actions from your retrospectives.
|
40
|
|
The facilitator captures team
open-ended feedback using a wheel that encourages team members to assess an
iteration or milestone using 5 categories. Allow some time following
completing the “wheel” to discuss and agree on specific changes to implement
|
Obtain feedback on team process
in order to learn what should be continued and what should be adjusted as the
team moves forward. Is a fast way to conduct a “meta” process discussion.
|
10-25
|
|
The method ensures that each
participant meets and interacts with every other participant.
|
When retrospective participants
do not know each other well
|
Variable!
|
|
Use various tools such as a
complexity radar to discover and find out how to deal with the complexity in
your project
|
Many projects go awry due to
excessive complexity; use this plan to evaluate whether your team is
approaching things in the simplest way that can work; especially when the
deadlines begin to loom.
|
40-60
|
|
A plan designed around the
force field analysis technique
|
A retrospective for your whole
company/department or to analyse a particular topic
|
60
|
|
Focused and time-constrained by
using the Pomodoro technique
|
Useful for determining a single
action to improve the work of a small team
|
25
|
|
A retrospective for
retrospectives
|
To learn how to improve the
effectiveness of your retrospectives
|
60+
|
|
Iteration retrospective
|
To get different perspectives
on the same events
|
60
|
|
Simple sprint retrospective
|
Basic / everyday retrospective
plan
|
90 - 120
|
|
Liked – Learned – Lacked –
Longed For
|
Iteration and project
retrospectives as well as for retrospection of training and conference
events.
|
90 - 120
|
|
What anchors slow the team
down, what wind propels it forward?
|
Good for the "gather
data" and "generate insights" portions of a retrospective
|
90 - 120
|
|
Review, Plus-Delta, Vote,
Actions, Owners
|
A weekly retrospective for your
project
|
60
|
|
Use the answers as base to get
all the good things and bad things that happened
|
A different way to "gather
data" and to get all different opinions on a subject
|
60
|
|
An approach to scaling
retrospectives by collecting outcomes across an Agile Release Train, Tribe or
any multi team scenario.
|
Use for understanding
challenges and opportunities across when scaling agile.
|
15-30
|
I’ve decided
to try a few of these: Plan of Action, Start /Stop/ Continue/ More of/ Less Wheel,
Retrospective Surgery, Four Ls Retrospective, and Bubble Up . I also like the ideas listed in the Everyday
Retrospective, but I’m not sure I can cram all of that into the 15 minutes I
have allotted for each team scrum. In
any case, I’ll chronicle the results here over the next few weeks.
I was most
excited about Sailboat, because it was touted as being great for distributed
teams. I was excited until I went to the
website and found that it is no longer available as a collaborative game. However, there are many other tools on that
website that I found useful. For
instance, I might do the “Actions for Retrospectives” game with my distributed
teams. You can check out all the fun at http://innovationgames.com/resources/instant-play-games/
. I might try using the Sailboat,
though, for co-located teams.
If you have
any retrospective ideas you’d like to share, please let me know! I welcome your feedback!
Tuesday, July 23, 2013
Recommended Agile Reading
From time to time, I will review and/or list books that I find helpful. I don't have time to go into a full review while I'm on my lunch break, but right now I'm re-reading
The Agile Samurai: How Agile Masters Deliver Great Software (Pragmatic Programmers), by Jonathan Rasmusson. It's a great back-to-basics book for those of us who have been doing the agile thing for a while. For those of us who are newer to the agile universe, it is a must have for your Agile Library. It also has some great tips and tricks for all role types. I highly recommend it. You can get the Kindle Edition for less than $20 on Amazon right now.
The Agile Samurai: How Agile Masters Deliver Great Software (Pragmatic Programmers), by Jonathan Rasmusson. It's a great back-to-basics book for those of us who have been doing the agile thing for a while. For those of us who are newer to the agile universe, it is a must have for your Agile Library. It also has some great tips and tricks for all role types. I highly recommend it. You can get the Kindle Edition for less than $20 on Amazon right now.
Thursday, July 11, 2013
How to Give a GREAT Demo!
One of the
major tenets of Agile is the Product Demo.
As we all know, agile encourages us to demo at the end of our
sprints. This is done for several
reasons. Not only does this keep us
accountable to our customers, but it helps us to focus on forward thinking. At many companies, it is highly likely that
actual external customers will attend these demos, so it is of the utmost
importance that we always put forth our very best.
In our
pursuit of excellence, here are a few things to keep in mind when prepping for
a demo. I compiled this list with a few of my collegues, so I can't take all the credit. Here goes.
What to include in every demo deck
Frame
the demo with PowerPoint and then broadcast it via a webinar. Just about everyone has access to a phone and
the internet, so use them. You can bring
in your external customers this way, while still catering to your internal
customers. That being said, always be
cognizant of WHEN you have customers attending your demos. Make sure you inform everyone just who is on
the phone so that you’re on your best behavior.
That’s
great, you say. But what should I
include?
Project
Goal
This is basically
the goal of the project, our elevator pitch, our reason for being. This needs to be repeated at every demo
because our audience fluctuates.
Customer
Value
This is the
reason the world needs our project. Again,
the overall customer value of the project needs to be repeated every demo. However, sprint specific value can be spelled
out in the goals we set for ourselves.
We should be able to answer questions like “What have we given to
customers thus far”, “What are we delivering next”, and “What are our plans for
future customer value?” Additionally,
customer value should be integral to every part of our demo. When we show something live, we need
introduce it in such a way that spells out WHY it is valuable to our internal
and/or external customers.
Sprint
Goals
I think this
is optional for demos that include external customers. You don’t want to get TOO in the weeds
because you want to keep your external customers engaged.
These goals ultimately
align with the overall project goal, but think of them as bite-sized pieces
that we can deliver iteratively. Sprint
goals usually change every two weeks and are specific to the work to which we’ve
committed. These goals should manifest
with customer value in mind. Remember:
customers are both internal and external.
Project
Status
This lets
everyone attending the demo know the health of our project. It should answer questions describing how
we’re tracking to our road map deadline, how much work is left, and whether or
not we are meeting our commitments. We also need to comment on
major milestones or epics: are they done, and if not, are they accounted
for? Finally, do our customers KNOW what
we’re giving them? Have we communicated TO
THEM the way we’re going to change their world for the better?
Live
Demo
Show
everyone how awesome we are! Get to it
with live demos of transitions, versioning, provisioning, wireframes, slick UI,
YOU NAME IT. DO NOT merely insert slides
stating what we did. SHOW IT OFF! If we have very little or nothing live to
demo, then we need to show reports, matrices, RACIs, Visio diagrams, etc. This is all in addition to anything live we
can show. Also, we shouldn’t demo any
stories that are incomplete. That’s just
plain silliness.
What to
Expect Next
“What To
Expect Next” is usually the Product Owner’s vision of things to come, tempered
by the realism of the team as a whole. While
we haven’t had planning for the next sprint yet, we need to let our audience
know what’s on the horizon for our project.
This gives them the opportunity to plan whether or not they need to
attend or whether or not they can move forward with their own agenda (project
dependencies, sales pipelines, roadmap planning, etc). This also keeps us always looking forward. Keep in mind that “what to expect next” can
change based on feedback and market trends, and this is the very reason why we
demo! We need that feedback to make sure
our customers are getting the value they’re asking for.
Things
you need to do as a teammate
BE THERE
This means
physically as well as mentally, even if you haven’t contributed much during the
sprint. Try to avoid being out of the
office on demo days. Being together
lends credence to what we’re doing, and it also serves to bolster team
morale.
Participate
While not
everyone can participate at every demo, make it a point to participate as much
as possible.
Make sure
the demo is recorded
This is more
for moderators/facilitators, but if you can, help remind them to push the
“record” button. Recorded demos help
keep our executives and sales folks in the loop when they can’t make it to
demos.
Tips and Tricks
Announce
wins
If we’ve
done something great, then we need to shout it from the rooftops! Find creative and exciting ways to weave
these wins into the demo deck.
Demo Prep
This is a
dress rehearsal, so to speak. In prep we
can iron out technology wrinkles, get a feel for presentation flow, and
actually calm our nerves. I like to do
demo prep an hour or so before the demo.
If we
promise something in a previous demo, we need to deliver it in a subsequent
demo. If we don’t, then we need to explain
why.
This is
self-explanatory.
Have fun
with images!
Image
searches on Google bring up loads of crazy things. Create interest! Incorporate some of these into our
demos! Of course, all things should be
done in moderation and good taste.
Remember: external customers can and will see these demos!
So that’s it
in a nutshell. Be prepared and have
fun! What are some ways you give great demos? Chime in!
Wednesday, July 3, 2013
User Stories: Make ‘em SMALLER, please!
User stories
are the building blocks of whatever project we’re working on, are they
not? They give structure. They give solidarity. They stand things up. Epics are the larger, overall stories that lay
the foundation. When building something,
it is prudent to have the larger stories on the bottom and the smaller stories
on the top. I could get into the engineering
aspects of building design, but I’m not smart enough to discuss such
things. I’ll stick to what I know. Here’s what I’m getting at: make the user
stories smaller than the epics. This
seems like a no-brainer, but too-big user stories are way too common.
One of the
largest hurdles I face in early sprint planning sessions is user story
size. Yes, we’ve sized them previously
in Release Planning, but once in a while we hit stories that are just BIG. At first, new teams think they can tackle these
monstrosities in one sprint, but then they quickly learn that just isn’t
possible. They over-commit and velocity
takes a hit. Have you been there? I have.
As the team
grows together and matures, they realize what they can and can’t do. They eventually get better at estimating. In the meantime, how do we – the scrum masters
– mitigate this? How do we get our teams from the Dark Side of too-big user
stories to the Jedi Side of small, manageable stories?
We guide
them in breaking down these user stories into smaller stories, AND we give them
the tools to do this.
There are
many resources at your fingertips. I’ve
perused these myself and have found that the INVEST model works best. I got this from the guys over at Agile for All, but they got it from Bill
Wake. Check out his original article here. In a nutshell, your stories should be the
following:
·
Independent
o
Self-contained.
Not dependent on another user story.
·
Negotiable
o
Right up to committing to a user story in a
sprint, you can rewrite it or change requirements.
·
Valuable
o
Self-explanatory. The end-user needs to get something from
it.
·
Estimable
o
This means that “infinity” doesn’t work. If the story is to be sized, it needs to be
reasonable.
·
Small
o
You have to be able to complete it in one
sprint. This includes Dev AND QA
work.
·
Testable
o
QA folks need to know what the heck is expected
as an outcome of this story. It’s called
user acceptance criteria.
If your user
stories fall short on one of these, then you need to rethink it. Should it have more details? Can tasks be divided out to create another
user story that’s smaller? Still
stuck? Check out Richard Lawrence’s workflow on
how to split a user story. I learned
from him early in my agile career. He knows
what he’s talking about.
Hopefully,
once you’re done you can get the user stories into your sprint and be on your merry
way. Ideally, the product owner would
have taken care of this breakdown and user story grooming outside sprint
planning. That’s not always the norm,
and we scrum masters have to adapt!
What are
some methods you incorporate into your planning to cut stories into bite-sized
pieces? Please chime in. I’d love to learn from you!
Labels:
agile,
agile best practices,
Agile For All,
agile forum,
Bill Wake,
INVEST,
kanban,
lean,
Richard Lawrence,
scrum,
scrum best practices,
scrum forum,
scrum master,
sdlc,
software development,
user stories
Tuesday, July 2, 2013
Welcome!
Hello and welcome to my first blog post on Scrum Bubbles! I know there are LOADS of scrum resources out there, so thanks for stopping by.
Let me start by telling you why I decided to join the hoards of scrum blogs. I love being a scrum master. Pure and simple. I love to keep teams moving forward and all the interaction that entails. I'm hoping that my love of people will bubble into my posts and help you see how to ALWAYS look at the human element in what we do as scrum masters.
What will I share, you ask? I'm going to share my ups and downs with you. I'll share best practices (and not so best ones) and detail training I'm getting. I'll look at trends in the community. I hope we can share laughter and thoughts. I hope to not only give you ideas but to encourage you to give your ideas as well. I want us to share in a common pool of knowledge and help one another. So... what do you say? Are you in?
Let me start by telling you why I decided to join the hoards of scrum blogs. I love being a scrum master. Pure and simple. I love to keep teams moving forward and all the interaction that entails. I'm hoping that my love of people will bubble into my posts and help you see how to ALWAYS look at the human element in what we do as scrum masters.
What will I share, you ask? I'm going to share my ups and downs with you. I'll share best practices (and not so best ones) and detail training I'm getting. I'll look at trends in the community. I hope we can share laughter and thoughts. I hope to not only give you ideas but to encourage you to give your ideas as well. I want us to share in a common pool of knowledge and help one another. So... what do you say? Are you in?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)